ABSTRACT

Objective: To establish reference values and prediction equations for the strength index (S-Index), in order to meet the growing demand for clinical application and diagnostic understanding of maximal dynamic inspiratory pressure. Methods: This was a prospective study of 120 healthy subjects between 18 and 80 years of age. The S-Index, measured from RV to TLC after at least eight reproducible maximal maneuvers with a < 10% difference, was obtained. The MIP was also measured, and differences between S-Index and MIP values were analyzed. A multiple linear regression model estimating the S-Index value was based on clinically significant independent variables. For model cross-validation and diagnostic accuracy, we used a separate sample of COVID-19 survivors to compare the observed and predicted S-Index values. Results: The S-Index strongly correlated with the FEV1 and FVC. However, sex, age, weight, and height retained their significance in all final models, collectively explaining 62% of the variation in the observed values. The performance of the prediction equation was satisfactory in suggesting differences between COVID-19 survivors with an MIP < 80 cmH2O and those with an MIP = 80 cmH2O. For both sexes, the S-Index exhibited the potential for ruling out, rather than confirming, inspiratory muscle weakness. If below the lower limit of normal, further evaluation is important, especially in men. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first set of reference equations for the S-Index based on a healthy adult population across various age groups in Brazil. Its potential as an adjunct index in evaluating inspiratory muscle strength was also explored for the first time.

Keywords: Maximal respiratory pressures; Muscle strength; Respiratory muscles.

THE CONTENT OF THIS ARTICLE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THIS LANGUAGE.